Scams, Frauds
and The State
Not a single
day passes off these days without the newspapers carrying some or the other sob
stories of people robbed of lakhs or even sometimes crores of rupees from their
bank accounts. Usually the stories how the victims receive calls from unknown
callers with enticing news like a parcel for you awaiting to be picked up from the Customs counter at
the local airport after paying the duty into a bank account mentioned or the news form a recently acquired
friend in a matrimonial site asking for
a deposit in an account to clear his immigration obstacle or an SOS message
from a friend stuck in a foreign land with his passport and purse stolen for an
immediate transfer to a bank account so as to secure his release and
return home. The victims are not the poor uneducated rural customers as one
would think of anyone falling prey to such frauds or scams but highly educated
city- bred professionals like advocates, doctors, business-executives, cinema
actors and society ladies. The stories end with victims
filing complaints with the bank, or specially created cyber crime wings of
police etc. and the usual warning to not respond to phone calls from unknown
phone callers.
There are also
types of cyber-crimes. With so much online use for buying, selling, enquiring,
travel and entertainment booking and even medical appointment and data sources like
Wikipedia, Google, the whereabouts of one’s lifestyles, food habits, health and
hobbies choice preferences fora thousands of things of all of us are an open
book for anyone to exploit our vulnerability. Many societies have therefore
enacted laws and systems to prevent, detect and punish those committing crimes.
This is not withstanding the State itself for security reasons using cyber
technology to detect and punish terrorists, drug mafia, human trafficators.
With so much
danger looming large on our right to privacy and the State’s duty to protect
its citizens, a moot question arises “Are laws and intentions alone sufficient?
Apparently not as the following news item
would suggest/
As per a news item “” Bank not
liable for following orders sent via hacked email” in The Times of India Mumbai
dated16th Sept, a compliant by a Bank customer alleging negligence and
deficiency in service and due diligence has been kicked about like a football
between the Bank, Ombudsman, the State Consumer Commission and the concerned
govt agency for cyber-crime. The Bank maintained that the party most
responsible for causing the payment to be misdirected must bear the loss. Th Ombudsman did not accept the
complaint for lack of details. The State Consumer Protection Commission considered
it not as a fraud arising out of negligence or deficiency of service or of due
diligence and interpreted it more as a cyber -crime fit to be dealt with by the
Government agency for cyber-crime under the relevant provisions of the cyber law.
Today one talks of One Nation, One Everything but no one talks talk about One Window for Victims of Fraud...
Is anyone listening?
No comments:
Post a Comment