Today we
live in a world, where thanks to technological advancements in communication
and digitization, countries have only geographical significance. Even problems
such as Covid 19 pandemic with its variants like Delta and Omicron, climate
change, terrorism, drug menace, human trafficking, etc., affect all nations.
The
fight against these scourges also tends to get global with nations coming
together under the aegis of The United Nations (UN) through organs like
World Health Organisation(WHO), the UN Counter-Terrorism Committee, the
UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change(IPCC). Besides these, other bodies like NATO, G20 summit,
Conference of Parties 26 both held recently in Rome Glasgow respectively
also discuss ways and means of dealing with the problems.
A fair
assessment of the results of these global initiatives however points out that
the problems still persist. The main reason for this is that though nations
gather to find unanimity of approach, their respective national interests take
a higher priority than the compulsion of implementing an agreed decision or
solution.
Take the Covid 19 pandemic for a case. When the first and second waves of
Covid were in full swing calling for vigorous vaccination drives, strict
quarantine of victims, area lockdowns, and travel restrictions, many
nations faced problems of insufficient quantities of vaccines, hospital beds,
oxygen cylinders logistics difficulties, and demand outstripping supply,.
Production of vaccines to meet the global needs at affordable costs is fraught
with disputes over vaccine patent waivers. The WHO was crying hoarse to speed
up vaccination of all adult population and enforce rigorous enforcement of
Covid Appropriate Behaviour like masking the face, social distancing, and
frequent handwashing. Individual nations or even areas within a nation decided
these issues weighing the pros and cons of lockdowns vis-a-vis livelihood needs
of the people. Then there was the problem of resistance to vaccination by some
people.
The Paris
Agreement as a legally binding international treaty on climate change has set a
goal to limit global warming to a level below 2, preferably 1.5 degrees Celsius
compared to pre-industrial levels. This calls for all nations to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide which is the main pollutant from
burning coal for power generation. Both China and India have resisted attempts
for a G20 declaration on phasing out domestic coal consumption. Here the
economy of using locally available coal for the generation of power overrides
the global good of reduced pollution arising from power using non-fossil
sources.
The
question arises as to why global initiatives for dealing with global problems
have not delivered the goods in spite of the existence of global organs like
the UN and overall laudable efforts by leaders of various nations to find
solutions. Is it the respective national economic, political, social,
governance, ideological interest overwhelming global good.?
Can there be a leader(s) to lead other leaders? What will be that
entity's source of authority to lead? Will a group of public intellectuals,
activists, authors, statesmen, artists, academia be able and acceptable to
provide unified global leadership to leaders of governments? The UNGA and UNSC
are only assemblies of governments with some of them threatening to stop
funding and with weapons like Veto power can and have indeed torpedoed many
viable solutions for many problems in the past.